Australian Vanadium Limited Corporate Governance Statement
This Corporate Governance statement of Australian Vanadium Limited (the ‘company’) has been prepared in accordance with the 3rd Edition of the Australia Securities Exchanges (‘ASX’) Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations of the ASX Corporate Governance Council (‘ASX Principles and Recommendations’).
The Recommendations are guidelines and not prescriptions. The Council recognises that the range in size and diversity of companies is significant and that smaller companies from the outset may face particular issues in following all the Recommendations. If a company considers that a Recommendation is not appropriate to its particular circumstances, it has the flexibility not to adopt it.
The Board has adopted the best practice Recommendations as outlined by the Council to the extent that is deemed appropriate considering the current size and operations of the company.
This statement has been approved by the company’s Board of Directors (‘Board’) and is current as at 10 September 2020.
The ASX Principles and Recommendations and the company’s response as to how and whether it follows those recommendations are set out below.
– A listed entity should disclose: (a) the respective roles and responsibilities of its board and management; and (b) those matters expressly reserved to the board and those delegated to management.
As the Board acts on behalf of and is accountable to the shareholders, the Board seeks to identify the expectations of the shareholders, as well as other regulatory and ethical expectations and obligations and strives to meet those expectations. In addition, the Board is responsible for identifying areas of significant business risk and ensuring arrangements are in place to adequately manage those risks.
The role of the Board is to oversee and guide the management of Australian Vanadium Ltd with the aim of protecting and enhancing the interests of its shareholders and taking into account the interests of other stakeholders including employees and the wider community.
The Board has adopted a formal Charter which clearly establishes the relationship between the Board and management and describes their functions and responsibilities.
The Board is responsible for setting the strategic direction of the Company, establishing goals for management and monitoring the achievement of those goals.
The Board operates within the broad principles and responsibilities described in the following:
- ensuring the Company’s conduct and activities are ethical and carried out for the benefit of all its stakeholders;
- development of corporate strategy, implementation of business plans and performance objectives;
- reviewing ratifying and monitoring systems of risk management, codes of conduct and legal and regulatory compliance;
- the appointment of the Chief Executive Officer, to the Board as Managing Director;
the reappointment of Executives as required;
- monitoring executives’ performance and implementation of strategy’s required;
- determining appropriate remuneration policies;
- allocating resources and ensuring appropriate resources are available for management;
- approving and monitoring the annual budget, progress of major capital expenditure, capital management, and acquisitions and divestitures; and
- approving and monitoring financial and other reporting.
Other than as specifically reserved to the Board, responsibility for the day-to-day management of the Company’s business activities is delegated to the Executive Director and Managing Director.
The Board’s charter is available on the company’s website at www.australianvanadium.com.au.
A listed entity should: (a) undertake appropriate checks before appointing a person, or putting forward to security holders a candidate for election, as a director; and (b) provide security holders with all material information in its possession relevant to a decision on whether or not to elect or re-elect a director.
The company undertakes comprehensive reference checks prior to appointing a director or putting that person forward as a candidate to ensure that person is competent, experienced, and would not be impaired in any way from undertaking the duties of director. An election of directors is held each year. A director that has been appointed during the year must stand for election at the next Annual General Meeting (‘AGM’). Directors are appointed for a maximum term of three years. Retiring directors are not automatically re-appointed. The company provides to shareholders in the Notice of AGM relevant information for their consideration about the attributes of candidates together with whether the Board supports the appointment or re-election.
The Board’s charter, which is available on the company’s website at www.australianvanadium.com.au more fully sets out the specific responsibilities of the Board. Corporate expectations are set out in the directors’ letters of appointment.
A listed entity should have a written agreement with each director and senior executive setting out the terms of their appointment.
The terms of the appointment of a non-executive director are set out in writing and cover matters such as the term of appointment, time commitment envisaged, required committee work and other special duties, requirements to disclose their relevant interests which may affect independence, corporate policies and procedures, indemnities, and remuneration entitlements.
Executive directors and senior executives, where applicable, are issued with service contracts which detail the above matters as well as the person or body to whom they report, the circumstances in which their service may be terminated (with or without notice), and any entitlements upon termination.
The company secretary of a listed entity should be accountable directly to the board, through the chair, on all matters to do with the proper functioning of the board.
The Company Secretary reports directly to the Board through the Chairman and is accessible to all directors.
A listed entity should (a) have a diversity policy which includes requirements for the board or a relevant committee of the board to set measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity and to assess annually both the objectives and the entity’s progress in achieving them; (b) disclose that policy or a summary of it; and (c) disclose as at the end of each reporting period the measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by the board or a relevant committee of the board in accordance with the entity’s diversity policy and its progress towards achieving them, and either: (1) the respective proportions of men and women on the Board, in senior executive positions and across the whole organisation (including how the entity has defined “senior executive” for these purposes); or (2) if the entity is a “relevant employer” under the Workplace Gender Equality Act, the entity’s most recent “Gender Equality Indicators”, as defined in and published under that Act.
Diversity includes, but is not limited to, gender, age, ethnicity and cultural background. The Company is committed to diversity and recognises the benefits arising from employee and board diversity and the importance of benefiting from all available talent. Accordingly, the Company has established a diversity policy which is available on the Company’s website.
The Board has a commitment to promoting a corporate culture that is supportive of diversity and encourages the transparency of Board processes, review and appointment of Directors. The Board is responsible for developing policies in relation to the achievement of measurable diversity objectives and the extent to which they will be linked to the Key Performance Indicators for the Board, Managing Director and senior executives.
To the extent practicable, the Company will address the recommendations and guidance provided in the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations.
The Diversity Policy does not form part of an employee’s contract of employment with the company, nor gives rise to contractual obligations. However, to the extent that the Diversity Policy requires an employee to do or refrain from doing something and at all times subject to legal obligations, the Diversity Policy forms a direction of the company with which an employee is expected to comply.
The Board is responsible for developing measurable objectives (and these will be developed when the Board believes that the Company has reached a level of development that warrants these objectives) and strategies to meet the Objectives of the Diversity Policy (Measurable Objectives). The Board is also responsible for monitoring the progress of the Measurable Objectives through the monitoring, evaluation and reporting mechanisms listed below. The Board may also set Measurable Objectives for achieving gender diversity and monitor their achievement.
The Board will conduct all Board appointment processes in a manner that promotes gender diversity, including establishing a structured approach for identifying a pool of candidates, using external experts where necessary.
The Company’s diversity strategies may include:
- recruiting from a diverse range of candidates for all positions, including senior executive roles and Board positions;
- reviewing pre-existing succession plans to ensure that there is a focus on diversity;
- encouraging female participation across a range of roles across the Company;
- reviewing and reporting on the relative proportion of women and men in the workforce at all levels of the Company;
- articulating a corporate culture which supports workplace diversity and in particular, recognizes that employees at all levels of the Company may have domestic responsibilities;
- developing programs to encourage a broader pool of skilled and experienced senior management and Board candidates, including, workplace development programs, mentoring programs and targeted training and development; and
- any other strategies that the Board or the Nomination Committee develops from time to time.
At the date of this report the Company has ten full-time and part time employees, four of whom are female. No women are currently represented on the Board.
Due to the current size, nature and scale of the Company’s activities the Board is currently exploring opportunities regarding gender diversity. As the size and scale of the Company grows the Board will set and aim to achieve gender diversity objectives as director and senior executive positions become vacant and appropriately qualified candidates become available.
Monitoring and Evaluation
The Chairman will monitor the scope and currency of this policy.
The company with oversight form the Board is responsible for implementing, monitoring and reporting on the Measurable Objectives.
Measurable Objectives if set by the Board will be included in the annual key performance indicators for senior executives.
In addition, the Board will review progress against the Objectives, when determined, as a key performance indicator in its annual performance assessment.
The Board may include in the Annual Report each year:
- the Measurable Objectives, if any, set by the Board;
- progress against the Objectives; and
- the proportion of women employees in the whole organisation, at senior management level and at Board level.
No entity within the consolidated entity is a ‘relevant employer’ for the purposes of the Workplace Gender Equality Act 2012 and therefore no Gender Equality Indicators to be disclosed.
A listed entity should (a) have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the performance of the Board, its committees and individual directors; and (b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a performance evaluation was undertaken in the reporting period in accordance with that process.
The Board has not adopted any formal procedures for the review of the performance of the Board, however the performance of the Board is reviewed regularly by the Chairman, which is currently considered to meet the Board’s obligations sufficiently.
The review process takes into consideration all of the Board’s key areas of responsibility and accountability and is based on an amalgamation of factors including capability, skill levels, understanding of industry complexities, risks and challenges, and value adding contributions to the overall management of the business. The Board member assessment measures are the responsibility of the Chairman but are focused on objective and tangible criteria such as:
- Performance of the Company
- Accomplishment of long term strategic objectives
- Development of management
- Growth in shareholder value
Primarily, the review will be carried out through consultation by the Chairman and with the individual Directors. Directors whose performance is consistently unsatisfactory may be asked to retire.
The Board aims to ensure that shareholders are informed of all information necessary to assess the performance of the directors. Information is communicated to the shareholders through:
- the annual report which is distributed to all shareholders;
- the half-yearly report;
- the annual general meeting and other meetings to obtain shareholder approval for Board
- actions as appropriate; and
- continuous disclosure in accordance with ASX Listing Rule 3.1 and the Company’s continuous disclosure policy.
A listed entity should (a) have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the performance of its senior executives; and (b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a performance evaluation was undertaken in the reporting period in accordance with that process.
The Board has not adopted any formal procedures for the review of the performance of senior executives, however the Board will, as required, adopt an on-going assessment process to measure senior executive performance, with outcomes utilised to determine senior executive remuneration.
At the date of this report the Company executives comprised the Managing Director and Executive Director.
The board of a listed entity should (a) have a nomination committee which: (1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are independent directors; and (2) is chaired by an independent director, and disclose: (3) the charter of the committee; (4) the members of the committee; and (5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or (b) if it does not have a nomination committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs to address Board succession issues and to ensure that the board has the appropriate balance of skills, knowledge, experience, independence and diversity to enable it to discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively.
The functions that would be performed by a nomination committee are currently performed by the full Board. Having regard to the number of members currently comprising the Company’s Board and the stage of the Company’s development, the Board does not consider it appropriate to delegate these responsibilities to a sub-committee. Accordingly the Company was not in compliance with Recommendation 2.1 during the financial year. These arrangements will be reviewed periodically by the Board to ensure that they continue to be appropriate to the Company’s circumstances.
Recommendations of candidates for new directors are made by the directors for consideration by the Board as a whole. If it is necessary to appoint a new director to fill a vacancy on the Board or to complement the existing Board, a wide potential base of possible candidates is considered. If a candidate is recommended by a director, the Board assesses that proposed new director against a range of criteria including background, experience, professional skills, personal qualities, the potential for the candidate’s skills to augment the existing Board and the candidate’s availability to commit to the Board’s activities. If these criteria are met and the Board appoints the candidate as a director, that director must retire at the next following General Meeting of Shareholders and will be eligible for election by shareholders at that General Meeting.
A listed entity should have and disclose a board skills matrix setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the board currently has or is looking to achieve in its membership.
In view of its size the Board does not maintain a formal skills matrix that sets out the mix of skills and diversity that the Board aims to achieve in its membership. However, the individual directors and the Board as a whole recognise the importance for the Board to have the skills, knowledge, experience and diversity of background required to effectively steer the company over time in response to market developments, opportunities and challenges. The Board recognizes certain core skills that are required for the Board to ensure effective stewardship of the company. These include business and strategic expertise, experience with financial markets, industry knowledge, accounting and finance skills, project management experience and personal ethics, attributes and skills. The current Board members represent individuals that have extensive business and industry experience as well as professionals that bring to the Board their specific skills in order for the company to achieve its strategic, operational and compliance objectives. Their suitability to the directorship has been determined primarily on the basis of their ability to deliver outcomes in accordance with the company’s short and longer term objectives and therefore deliver value to shareholders.
A listed entity should disclose: (a) the names of the directors considered by the board to be independent directors; (b) if a director has an interest, position, association or relationship of the type described in Box 2.3 but the board is of the opinion that it does not compromise the independence of the director, the nature of the interest, position, association or relationship in question and an explanation of why the board is of that opinion; and (c) the length of service of each director.
Details of the Board of directors, their appointment date, length of service and independence status is as follows:
|Director’s name||Appointment date||Length of service at reporting date||Independence status|
|Brenton Lewis||Leslie Ingraham||Vincent Algar||Daniel Harris|
|15 July 2010||31 January 2011||29 April 2016||1 February 2017|
|7 years 2 months||6 years 8 months||1 year 5 months||8 months|
|Independent – Non-Executive Director||Not Independent – Executive Director||Not Independent – Managing Director||Independent – Non-Executive Director|
The Board has reviewed the position and associations of each of the directors in office at the date of this report and considers that Mr Brenton Lewis and Mr Daniel Harris are independent non-executive directors. Mr Vincent Algar, Managing Director, and Mr Leslie Ingraham, Executive Director are not considered independent in terms of Recommendation 2.3 and other facts, information and circumstances that the Board considers relevant. The Board assesses the independence of new directors upon appointment and reviews their independence, and the independence of other directors, as appropriate.
A majority of the board of a listed entity should be independent directors.
Having regard to the response to Recommendation 2.3 above, a majority of the Board are not independent.
Due to the size of the Company, and the stage of the Company’s development, the Board does not consider it appropriate to maintain independent directors. Accordingly, the Company was not in compliance with Recommendation 2.4 during the financial year. These arrangements will be reviewed periodically by the Board to ensure that they continue to be appropriate to the Company’s circumstances and consistent with effective management and good governance.
The Chair of the board of a listed entity should be an independent director and, in particular, should not be the same person as the CEO of the entity.
The Chair is independent as disclosed in Recommendation 2.3.
A listed entity should have a program for inducting new directors and provide appropriate professional development opportunities for directors to develop and maintain the skills and knowledge needed to perform their role as directors effectively.
The company has, due to the Board’s size, an informal induction process. New directors are fully briefed about the nature of the business, current issues, the corporate strategy and the expectations of the company concerning performance of directors.
Directors receive a formal letter of appointment setting out the key terms and conditions relevant to that appointment. Generally, directors undertake their own continuing education.
A listed entity should: (a) have a code of conduct for its directors, senior executives and employees; and (b) disclose that code or a summary of it.
The Board endeavours to ensure that the Directors, officers and employees of the Company act with integrity and observe the highest standards of behaviour and business ethics in relation to their corporate activities. The “Code of Conduct” sets out the principles, practices, and standards of personal behaviour the Company expects people to adopt in their daily business activities.
All Directors, officers and employees are required to comply with the Code of Conduct. Senior managers are expected to ensure that employees, contractors, consultants, agents and partners under their supervision are aware of the Company’s expectations as set out in the Code of Conduct.
All Directors, officers and employees are expected to:
- comply with the law;
- act in the best interests of the Company;
- be responsible and accountable for their actions; and
- observe the ethical principles of fairness, honesty and truthfulness, including prompt
- disclosure of potential conflicts.
The Code of Conduct is available on the company’s website.
Securities Trading by Directors and Employees
Australian Vanadium Ltd has adopted a Securities Trading Policy. The policy summarises the law relating to insider trading and sets out the policy of the company on directors, officers, employees and consultants dealing in securities of the company. The Securities Trading Policy is available on the company’s website.
This policy is provided to all directors and employees and compliance with it is reviewed on an ongoing basis in accordance with the company’s risk management systems.
The board of a listed entity should: (a) have an audit committee which: (1) has at least three members, all of whom are non-executive directors and a majority of whom are independent directors; and (2) is chaired by an independent director, who is not the chair of the board, and disclose: (3) the charter of the committee; (4) the relevant qualifications and experience of the members of the committee; and (5) in relation to each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or (b) if it does not have an audit committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs that independently verify and safeguard the integrity of its corporate reporting, including the processes for the appointment and removal of the external auditor and the rotation of the audit engagement partner.
The functions that would be performed by an audit committee are currently performed by the full Board. Having regard to the number of members currently comprising the Company’s Board and the stage of the Company’s development, the Board does not consider it appropriate to delegate these responsibilities to a sub-committee. Accordingly the Company was not in compliance with Recommendation 4.1 during the financial year. These arrangements will be reviewed periodically by the Board to ensure that they continue to be appropriate to the Company’s circumstances.
However meetings are held throughout the year between the Board, the Company Secretary and the company’s auditors to discuss the company’s ongoing activities and any proposed changes prior to their implementation.
The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the integrity of the company’s financial reporting and overseeing the independence of the external auditors. The Board sets aside time to deal with issues and responsibilities usually delegated to the Audit Committee to ensure the integrity of the financial statements of the company and the independence of the auditor.
The Board reviews the audited annual and half-year financial statements and any reports which accompany published financial statements and recommends their approval to the members. The Board also reviews annually the appointment of the external auditor, their independence and their fees.
Details of the qualifications and experience of the members of the Committee, being the full Board, are contained in the ‘Information on directors’ section of the Directors’ report.
The Company’s policy is to appoint external auditors who clearly demonstrate quality and independence. The performance of the external auditor is reviewed annually and applications for tender of external audit services are requested as deemed appropriate, taking into consideration assessment of performance, existing value and tender costs. It is Armada Audit & Assurance Pty Ltd’s policy to rotate engagement partners on listed companies at least every five years.
An analysis of fees paid to the external auditors, including a break-down of fees for non-audit services, is provided in the notes to the financial statements in the Annual Report.
There is no indemnity provided by the Company to the auditor in respect of any potential liability to third parties.
The board of a listed entity should, before it approves the entity’s financial statements for a financial period, receive from its CEO and CFO a declaration that, in their opinion, the financial records of the entity have been properly maintained and that the financial statements comply with the appropriate accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of the entity and that the opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal control which is operating effectively.
For the financial year ended 30 June 2017 and the half-year ended 31 December 2016, the company’s CEO and CFO, or equivalents, provided the Board with the required declarations.
A listed entity that has an AGM should ensure that its external auditor attends its AGM and is available to answer questions from security holders relevant to the audit.
A representative of the company’s external audit firm attends the AGM and is available to answer shareholder questions from shareholders relevant to the audit.
A listed entity should (a) have a written policy for complying with its continuous disclosure obligations under the Listing Rules; and (b) disclose that policy or a summary of it.
The company maintains a written policy that outlines the responsibilities relating to the directors, officers and employees in complying with the company’s continuous disclosure obligations. Where any such persons are of any doubt as to whether they possess information that could be classified as market sensitive, they are required to notify the Company Secretary immediately in the first instance. The policy provides the mechanism by which relevant market sensitive information that may have a material effect on the price of the company’s securities is released to the ASX in a timely manner.
The Company Secretary has primary responsibility for the disclosure of material information to ASIC and ASX and maintains a procedural methodology for disclosure, as well as for record keeping.
The Board reviews the Company’s compliance with this policy on an ongoing basis and will update it from time to time, if necessary.
The company’s Continuous Disclosure Policy is available on its website.
A listed entity should provide information about itself and its governance to investors via its website.
The company maintains information in relation to corporate governance documents, directors and senior executives, Board and committee charters, annual reports, ASX announcements and contact details on the company’s website.
Recommendations 6.2 and 6.3
A listed entity should design and implement an investor relations program to facilitate effective two-way communication with investors (6.2).
A listed entity should disclose the policies and processes it has in place to facilitate and encourage participation at meetings of security holders (6.3).
The company is committed to promoting effective communications with shareholders by ensuring they and the investment market generally are provided with full and timely disclosure of its activities and providing equal opportunity for all stakeholders to receive externally available information issued by the company in a timely manner. The company provides shareholders with periodic updates on its business. Shareholders are encouraged to communicate by electronic means and to participate at the Annual General Meeting, to ensure a high level of accountability and identification with the company’s strategy and goals.
The company’s Shareholder Communication Policy is available on its website.
A listed entity should give security holders the option to receive communications from, and send communications to, the entity and its security registry electronically.
The company engages its share registry to manage the majority of communications with shareholders. Shareholders are encouraged to receive correspondence from the company electronically, thereby facilitating a more effective, efficient and environmentally friendly communication mechanism with shareholders. Shareholders not already receiving information electronically can elect to do so through the share registry, Computershare Investor Services Pty Ltd at www.computershare.com.au.
Recommendations 7.1 & 7.2
The board of a listed entity should: (a) have a committee or committees to oversee risk, each of which: (1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are independent directors; and (2) is chaired by an independent director, and disclose: (3) the charter of the committee; (4) the members of the committee; and (5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or (b) if it does not have a risk committee or committees that satisfy (a) above, disclose that fact and the processes it employs for overseeing the entity’s risk management framework (7.1).
The board or a committee of the board should: (a) review the entity’s risk management framework at least annually to satisfy itself that it continues to be sound; and (b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether such a review has taken place (7.2).
The functions that would be performed by a risk committee are currently performed by the full Board. Having regard to the number of members currently comprising the Company’s Board and the stage of the Company’s development, the Board does not consider it appropriate to delegate these responsibilities to a sub-committee. Accordingly the Company was not in compliance with Recommendation 7.1 during the financial year. These arrangements will be reviewed periodically by the Board to ensure that they continue to be appropriate to the Company’s circumstances.
The Board reviews risks to the company at regular Board meetings. The Company’s policies are designed to ensure strategic, operational, legal, reputation and financial risks are identified, assessed, effectively and efficiently managed and monitored to enable achievement of the Company’s business objectives.
The company manages material business risks under a risk management policy which is available on its website. There is an ongoing program to identify, monitor and manage compliance issues and material business risks with a view to enhancing the value of every shareholder’s investment and safeguarding the company’s investments. The Board reviews the identification, management and reporting of risk as part of the annual budget process. More frequent reviews are undertaken as conditions or events dictate. Where necessary, the board draws on the expertise of appropriate external consultants to assist in dealing with or mitigating risk.
A listed entity should disclose: (a) if it has an internal audit function, how the function is structured and what role it performs; or (b) if it does not have an internal audit function, that fact and the processes it employs for evaluating and continually improving the effectiveness of its risk management and internal control processes.
The Board has the responsibility for ensuring the effectiveness of risk management and internal compliance and control. As part of the review process the Board considers the extent to which the risk process has been successful in retrospect with regard to the identification and mitigation of risks. This is required at all times and the Board actively promotes a culture of quality and integrity.
The company does not have an internal audit function due to its size; however the company’s procedures and policies are subject to regular review. The Board also liaises closely with the company’s external auditor to identify potential improvements to the risk management and internal control procedures.
The Board acknowledges that it is responsible for the overall internal control framework, but recognises that no cost effective internal control system will preclude all errors and irregularities.
Management practices have been established to ensure:
- The Company’s operations are safe and conducted in accordance with all applicable laws including the applicable health and safety regulations;
- Capital expenditure and revenue commitments above a certain size obtain prior Board approval;
- Financial exposures are controlled, including the potential use of derivatives;
- Occupational health and safety standards and management systems are monitored and reviewed to achieve high standards of performance and compliance with regulations;
- Material contracts are reviewed by qualified legal personnel;
- Business transactions are properly authorised and executed;
- The quality and integrity of personnel;
- Financial reporting accuracy and compliance with the financial reporting regulatory framework; and
- Environmental regulation compliance.
A listed entity should disclose whether it has any material exposure to economic, environmental and social sustainability risks and, if it does, how it manages or intends to manage those risks.
The company does not believe it has any material exposure to economic, environmental and social sustainability risks.
The board of a listed entity should: (a) have a remuneration committee which: (1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are independent directors; and (2) is chaired by an independent director, and disclose: (3) the charter of the committee; (4) the members of the committee; and (5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or (b) if it does not have a remuneration committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs for setting the level and composition of remuneration for directors and senior executives and ensuring that such remuneration is appropriate and not excessive.
The functions that would be performed by a remuneration committee are currently performed by the full Board. Having regard to the number of members currently comprising the Company’s Board and the stage of the Company’s development, the Board does not consider it appropriate to delegate these responsibilities to a sub-committee. Accordingly the Company was not in compliance with Recommendation 8.1 during the financial year. These arrangements will be reviewed periodically by the Board to ensure that they continue to be appropriate to the Company’s circumstances.
Details of the qualifications and experience of the members of the committee, being the full Board, is detailed in the ‘Information on Directors’ section of the Directors’ Report in the Annual Report.
The Board oversees remuneration policy and monitors remuneration outcomes to promote the interests of shareholders by rewarding, motivating and retaining employees.
An outline of the Company’s remuneration policies in respect of directors and executives is set out in the audited Remuneration Report contained in the Directors’ Report in the Annual Report. Detailed disclosure of the remuneration paid to the Company’s directors and executives is set within the Remuneration Report section of the Annual Report.
The Company’s aim is to remunerate at a level that will attract and retain high-calibre directors and employees. Company officers and Directors are remunerated to a level consistent with the size of the Company.
In determining remuneration, the Board has taken a view that the full Board will hold special meetings or sessions as required. No Director participated in any deliberation regarding his or her own remuneration or related issues. The Board are confident that this process for determining remuneration is stringent and full details of remuneration policies and remuneration received by directors and executives in the current period is contained in the “Remuneration Report” within the Directors’ Report of the Annual Report.
The Board believes that it has implemented suitable practices and procedures that are appropriate for an organisation of this size and maturity.
A listed entity should separately disclose its policies and practices regarding the remuneration of non-executive directors and the remuneration of executive directors and other senior executives.
An outline of the Company’s remuneration policies in respect of directors and executives is set out in the audited Remuneration Report contained in the Directors’ Report.
The level of remuneration reflects the anticipated time commitments and responsibilities of the position having regard to the financial constraints on the company. Senior executives may be remunerated using combinations of fixed and performance based remuneration. Salaries are set at levels reflecting market rates having regard to the financial constraints on the company and performance based remuneration, when offered, will be linked to specific performance targets that are aligned to both short and long term objectives.
In accordance with best practice corporate governance, the structure of Non-Executive Director and Executive compensation is separate and distinct.
A listed entity which has an equity-based remuneration scheme should: (a) have a policy on whether participants are permitted to enter into transactions (whether through the use of derivatives or otherwise) which limit the economic risk of participating in the scheme; and (b) disclose that policy or a summary of it.
The use of derivatives or other hedging arrangements for unvested securities of the company or vested securities of the company which are subject to escrow arrangements is prohibited. Where a director or other senior executive uses derivatives or other hedging arrangements over vested securities of the company, this will be disclosed.